Convening the Field of CI

Enter your email address and select the appropriate button below to receive email notifications of updates to this site or remove yourself from the list
Subscribe Unsubscribe

September 14, 2005

intro to "Convening the Field of Collective Intelligence"

draft, version 0.2

Tom, please comment on the text, and/or even better, post your new 0.3 as new entry. Comments from anybody else are also welcome!

What is a "source document"?

“A source document is a reference text for continual renewal, and something that can be returned to at any point of paradox or difficulty in making choices. It provides a basis for dialogue that generates meaning. ‘Source’ refers to the basic elements from which something emerges. It applies to those things that are continually emerging, that have lives of their own, that generate their own shape and identity. A ‘document’ enables us to relate current circumstances and current development to original intentions. This provides us with a connection to our history and identity...” -- Emergence, organisation and freedom: the sources of innovation, a talk by Michael McMaster, London 1997.)

Intended uses of this document;

Posted by George Por, Wed, Sep 14 2005 12:44 AM
Comments (0) | TrackBack (0)
Categories: Invitation Documents |

August 28, 2005

Who Should Join our Core Group?

My suggestion would be that anyone can join us who

1. recognizes that there are multiple forms of (and "tribes" involved in) the broad field we're calling "collective intelligence and wisdom" (as suggested in my foundational articles);

2. believes that helping these diverse forms and tribes evolve
(a) a more coherent body of knowledge/practice/ideology
(e.g., George's idea of "shared language and mental models
of what collective intelligence is") and
(b) a more coherent field/network/movement for CI/W
will increase the ability of this emerging movement to generate greater collective intelligence and wisdom about itself so that it can meet its function of transforming the mess humanity has created into an evolutionary leap;

3. believes that before the end of 2006 there should be some sort of multi-day gathering of at least several dozen people (and preferably more) from all/most parts of this emerging field explicitly to facilitate (2a) and (2b) above; and

4. wants to be personally involved in catalyzing (2) and (3) with us. There need be no explicit shape to that personal involvement yet, just a calling to be involved in realizing the potential of (2) and (3).

I think anyone who meets all four criteria should be welcome to participate in this exploration. And anyone who does not meet all four criteria should not join us AT THIS STAGE, even if they have many other desirable qualifications. We may need to engage others (e.g., people with conference logistical skills and connections) later, once we are clearer on what we are doing.

What do you think of this as a standard? I feel that if all of us involved share these four points, there is a very good chance we will make good progress in Seattle 9/1-2.

Posted by Tom Atlee, Sun, Aug 28 2005 05:09 AM
Comments (1)
Categories: Invitation Documents |

August 26, 2005

The second invitation

The group that came together in response to our first invitation crafted a second, more elaborate invitation, on January 2nd, 2005, calling for a face-to-face meeting of the conveners group. We have not managed to arrange the timing and logistics of that meeting. However, most of the elements of that second invitation is still valid. See full text below.

Posted by George Por, Fri, Aug 26 2005 10:49 AM
Comments (0)
Categories: Invitation Documents | Purpose |
First invitation to convene a gathering of CI practitioners

Responding to a need we sensed in the world for augmenting the CI of the CI field itself, Tom Atlee and myself sent the following invitation to two dozen colleagues, on July 3rd, 2004,

Posted by George Por, Fri, Aug 26 2005 10:16 AM
Comments (0)
Categories: Invitation Documents |
Recent Entries
RSS 1.0
RSS 2.0