![]() |
||
What is Collective Intelligence?CI means many things to many people. Here, it refers to the capacity of human communities to evolve towards higher order complexity and integration through collaboration and innovation. This blog wants to be an embodiment of what it is about. If you care, subscribe and contribute.
(Un)subscribe
Archives
August 2005
June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 November 2004 October 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 January 2004 December 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003 March 2003 February 2003
Blogroll
Powered by
Movable Type 3.17 Technorati
|
July 25, 2003One MindShortly after quoting David Bohm on the need to develop a higher collective intelligence, in my blog entry related to Andrew Cohen’s ‘Intersubjective Enlightenment’, I've discovered another gem from Bohm. It became yet another source of my inspiration to create a new Learning Expedition, a form of collaborative action research, It would target the conditions of reaching and sustaining higher levels of collective intelligence and wisdom, over time. In this entry, I share with you both the Bohm quote and the very first articulation of the action research’s general frame, with great curiosity of what you think of both. Posted by George Por, Fri, Jul 25 2003 02:04 AM Comments (3) | TrackBack (0) Categories: Intersubjectivity | Synchronicity and CI | ________________________________________________________ July 22, 2003Intersubjective EnlightenmentIn the Spring/Summer issue of “What Is Enlightenment?” magazine, there’s a remarkable exchange between spiritual teacher Andrew Cohen and integral philosopher Ken Wilber, that touches the very heart of and upgrades my concerns for collective intelligence and wisdom. My first concern was a moral one. Seeing so much unnecessary, man-made suffering in the world, I thought there must be a better way; all we needed is an enlightened society driven by the high ideals of one for all and all for one. Later, as a young and radical sociologist, I’ve been studying laws that govern the social dimension of our existence, hoping to get a clue of how to bring an enlightened society about, and how I can add my talents to trends pointing that way. In my thirties, when I became a meditator, the context shifted again, each shift encompassing and transcending the previous context. The new, higher concern became the “reaching of irreversible loving-kindness” as my best bet to contribute to social enlightenment, in a way that has a chance to make a positive difference. In the late 80’s, I met David Bohm, in a small group that gathered in San Francisco, in the house of Sidney Lanier, to learn from this pioneering physicist, philosopher, and teacher of true dialogue. After the meeting I started reading more of his writings, and to my delight, I discovered a paragraph that became a new focalizer of my quest that’s still what drives my work and being. (At least, in my best days, :-) Here it is: "I'm proposing that we need to learn how to dialogue with each other because of all the fragmentation in the world. It seems to me the only way we can overcome that is by experiencing our wholeness together. We need a kind of social enlightenment to help that take place. In the past, people have developed ways to foster individual enlightenment, a higher intelligence for the individual through meditation or mystical insight or what-have-you. But we haven't worked on ways to develop a higher social intelligence." So, the key to the future is to learn “experiencing our wholeness together.” How can we do that? It can be learned, obviously, only in experience but not any kind of experience. Holding that question in my attention, I discovered another piece of the puzzle: "This is something that is a permanent cessation of these emotional negative thoughts. So that is my private nirvana. What we really need is a nirvana for society." -- The Dalai Lama Learning from those wise teachers, and others not mentioned here, whetted my appetite for growing capacity to experience it in the company of others. Then, I became lucky and got a “big meal” of experiencing our wholeness together, when it occurred spontaneously, around the dining table in Les Courmettes, a French retreat center just North of Nice, August 2002.
It happened in a 2-week retreat with Andrew Cohen, and 200 of its students. Looking back what happened, I’m not sure whether I can really call it “spontaneous,” given that we received ample guidance from Andrew that helped us refraining from ordinary chit-chat at meal times. Whatever happened, it’s interesting to see how it kept gaining more depth and meaning as I was reading the transcript of Andrew’s conversation with Ken Wilber. All quotes below are from the Spring/Summer issue of “What Is Enlightenment?” magazine. Posted by George Por, Tue, Jul 22 2003 10:15 PM Comments (2) | TrackBack (0) Categories: Intersubjectivity | ________________________________________________________ |
Recent Entries
Categories
Academic Research in CI
Autonomy, Communion, and CI Blogging for Emergence CI & Communities of Practice CI Basics CI of Open Source CI Within Co-intelligent Economy Cognitive Relations Collaborative Taxonomy Collective Intellect Augments Individual Collective Objectivity Collective Wisdom Community of CI Practitioners Definitions Democracy and CI Events Evolutionary Threshold From States to New Stage Hypertinence Intersubjectivity Leaning into the Unknown Local to Global to Local Mental Modeling Methodologies associated with CI Multi-community membership Politics and CI Questions Worth Asking Spiral Dynamics & the Colors of CI Synchronicity and CI Technologies That Support CI Time, attention, bandwidth & CI Towards an attention economy of CI Truth of Impersonality Visualizing Our Ecosystem Ways of Tuning with Collective Consciousness Syndicate
|